Prosperous Period for American Billionaires: Why the System Perpetuates Income Disparity

For many individuals in the United States, the financial landscape over the past five years has been challenging. Expenses have skyrocketed while salaries remains stagnant. Steep mortgage rates have made purchasing property a grim prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.

Many Americans have stated they're putting off major life decisions, including raising children or changing careers, because of the instability. But for a select few of people, the last five years couldn't have been more prosperous.

The Billionaire Boom

The fortune of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even during all the economic instability, the stock market has only continued to grow. This growth has primarily advantaged just a small number of Americans: 10% of the population owns 93% of stock market wealth.

As uneven as this distribution seems, it's the system working as it is currently designed.

"The wealthy have bought their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," explained wealth disparity expert Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are preying on the system of inequality."

Analyzing Income Brackets

To help others understand what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.

To modernize the concept, Collins classifies these "economic communities" based on income levels:

  • At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a household income of at least $110,000 and an total assets of over $1.5m.
  • The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
  • Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
  • Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.

Collectively, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.

"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still flying in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins noted. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're flying in a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system shuts down – you're set."

Extreme Affluence Consequences

The peak in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The control that this group has greatly exceeds those who are simply affluent, let alone the ordinary person who doesn't live in "Richistan" at all.

But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "billionaires shouldn't exist" misses the point and has a "whiff of exterminism" to it.

"It's the difference between individual behaviors and a framework of policies," Collins commented. "We should be worried about an economic system that funnels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."

The Four Pillars of Billionaire Wealth

To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins breaks it down into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, government influence and hyper-extraction.

When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through starting or running a successful business, which could get them residency in Affluent Town.

But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their skills to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes.

"Wealth defense professionals use a broad range of tools such as financial instruments, offshore bank accounts, secret corporations, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he details.

Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal

To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to secure fortune and protect its accumulation.

The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "extreme removal" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' daily existence largely through capital management, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies.

"Private equity is searching for those areas of the economy where they can extract value a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is stored in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can boost their expenses."

Tangible Effects

The results of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any substantial income improvement. And Collins said the hardship and discontent of this kind of society can lead to profound dissatisfaction.

"The most powerful oligarchs understand people are being left behind [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at accessing a potent "phony populism".

Policy Situation

The irony, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a string of billionaires to administrative posts. Along with wealthy entrepreneurs who had short yet influential roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.

This administrative framework, along with help from congressional allies, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make enduring decreases for the wealthy and corporations.

Potential Changes

While government groups continue to argue that immigration and unfavorable commercial treaties are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the issue remains: Will the opposing party, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.

Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including substantial modifications to the tax system, increasing the minimum wage and empowering worker groups.

"It was so, so close, and the legislation really did embody the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Elite control is not about developing so much as blocking. It's easier to block than it is to make something significant occur, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."

Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require continuous government action.

"It may be quickly that the balance shifts, and then it really is about sustaining a continuous public campaign to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can fix this. It is solvable."

Timothy Hanson
Timothy Hanson

Award-winning journalist with a passion for investigative reporting and storytelling, based in London.